Why I Built Leoric Watch
Leoric Watch started with a simple frustration: an uptime alert told us something failed, but not where to investigate first.
Published July 24, 2026 by Leoric
The alert was never the hard part
Most uptime monitoring tools answer an important question: did the endpoint respond? That signal matters. It protects customers from a problem that nobody has noticed yet.
But when an alert fires, the work begins. Someone needs to decide whether the issue is a deployment, an application error, a certificate problem, a background job, a third-party dependency, or a wider infrastructure event. The team moves between logs, cloud dashboards, error tracking, deployment history, and status pages. Under pressure, every extra tab costs attention.

That gap is why I built Leoric Watch.
I wanted an external monitor that does more than raise a red flag. I wanted it to become a useful starting point for the person who has to answer the next question: where should we look first?
Monitoring should lead to evidence
Leoric Watch begins with familiar uptime monitoring. You can watch websites and services, receive alerts when something changes, and keep a useful record of incidents. That first layer has to be reliable and straightforward.
The difference comes after detection. AI Diagnosis is designed to collect relevant operational context around an incident from connected sources, including Sentry, GitHub Actions, CloudWatch, and Loki. It does not pretend to replace the people who know a system. It gives them a smaller, more informed search space.
The goal is practical: see the external symptom, review what changed nearby, and follow the evidence rather than starting from a generic timeout message.
That changes the character of an alert. Instead of telling a team only that something is wrong, monitoring can help establish what is most likely to matter next.
Reliability is also a communication problem
I also built Leoric Watch with agencies in mind. When an agency manages client services, reliability is part of what the client is buying. A clear response matters as much as a quick diagnosis.
Clients should not have to visit a third-party page that feels detached from the agency responsible for their service. They need a simple, credible place to understand whether there is an incident, what is being done, and when the service has recovered.
That is why branded status pages and custom domains sit alongside monitoring and diagnosis. Incident response is not only an internal operations task. It is a customer experience.
Building for the moment after detection
There will always be a place for a simple availability check. Leoric Watch is not trying to make that basic job complicated.
It is being built for the next moment, when a team needs to turn a failure signal into evidence and action. That means improving the path from monitoring to diagnosis, making customer communication more deliberate, and keeping the product useful for the people responsible for real services.
If that is the workflow you want, start monitoring with Leoric Watch.